Star Trek Score

Star Trek Discovery Reviews Metacritic. I was cautiously optimistic after watching the pilot episodes, which showcased stunning visual effects and sets more than anything else. I understand that this is 2. Star Trek is competing with shows like Game of Thrones which has set the bar incredibly high for what general audiences expect from TV series nowadays. Visually I have no complaints, it looks as good or even better than most sci fi movies Ive seen recently, and Im perfectly OK with visual changes made to the alien races. Star Trek is a 2009 American science fiction adventure film directed by J. J. Abrams and written by Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman. It is the eleventh film in the. This feature is not available right now. Please try again later. Metacritic TV Reviews, Star Trek Discovery, Before the Enterprise, the U. S. S. Discovery set out to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new. Star Trek Score 2013' title='Star Trek Score 2013' />The other changecompromise that I have come to accept is that modern audiences want serialised programming, as opposed to a literal episodic format. This is part of the reason that I wasnt initially as turned off by the character of Michael Burnham as most people were. I understand that in a 1. In the case of Michael they are clearly going for a redemption arc, which is nothing new or interesting, but its perfectly passable. Long story short, I was hopeful that once the trappings of pilot dirty work were out of the way, we were in for some quality trek adventures, exploration, and maybe, just maybe, some discoveries along the way. Well, two episodes later Im genuinely sad to say that the quality of this show has taken a nosedive in the hands of infamous Hollywood hack Alex Kurtzman, known for helming such classics as The Amazing Spiderman 2, Star Trek Into Darkness, Transformers, and many more. Holistic Psychology Programs. Star Trek Discovery ended the first half of its debut season by blowing up its premise and jumping into the great unknown. What really happened Biography, filmography, trailers and image gallery. STO_Tom_Paris_feat-620x349.jpg' alt='Star Trek Score Pdf' title='Star Trek Score Pdf' />Only someone like Kurtzman could write a Star Trek ensemble, where literally every single character is a vapid, arrogant, smug prick who you hope fails in their mission to unleash war and destruction on the universe. Remember Gene Roddenberrys bright, hopeful vision of the future Well forget it, because Star Trek is about people fighting with each other over how best to create weapons of mass destruction, YAY In the pilot episode, the character Saru tells us that his race were biologically determined for the sole purpose of sensing the coming of death. Accounting Software For Tailoring Business Cards. I think the rest of the cast were biologically determined for the sole purpose of bickering at each other relentlessly while making highly idiotic decisions. But above all else, my main disappointment lies within the main character, Michael. And thats really the problem isnt it, this is a Star Trek show with a main character that the story almost exclusively focuses on. As I said, I was initially lenient on her despite the bizarre course of action she takes in the pilot episodes. I wanted to see her redeem herself by doing acts of kindness and selflessness, that would start out small and gradually become more and more significant. But less than two episodes after her mutiny, Michael is right back to her old ways. Its bad enough that shes cuddling up with the comically evil captain of the USS Discovery, Lorca, but whats worse is that she shows almost no signs of resentment for Lorcas boner for war and turning the Discovery into a war ship. You would think she of all people would be pleading for diplomacy and doing things differently, but no she has been relegated from her road to redemption and now serves as a passive protagonist, who spends her time caring for Lorcas murder machines. Star Trek Score MusicIn some scenes on the contrary, she actually does seem to be filled with regret but given her relationship with Lorca it just feels so tonally off. What the hell is this character supposed to be Its like shes being written by two different people who speak different languages and cant communicate with each other or something. Oh, and speaking of relegated characters, Saru is now a walking vessel for Michaels backstorysob stories to be filled in. At some point the writers must have realised that their main character is a miserable villain with no sympathetic qualities, so every now and then they drag Saru, one of her old colleagues into the scene so we can have a scene of her briefly smiling, as opposed to her usual expression of despair. I realise that I only have a few hundred characters left, which wont be enough to fully articulate my hatred for the character of Paul Stamets, but it goes without saying he encapsulates everything wrong with this new series. Its a Trek series that portrays the future as a dismal battlefield in space, one that I wouldnt WANT to discover. It feels like a Star Trek rollercoaster ride at six flags, not a serial. Before I end it I want to mention that I dont blame the character of Michael on the actress Martin Green, I actually think shes doing a pretty good job with what shes been given. Same with Saru, Lorca and Phillipa who I havent mentioned, but I enjoyed Michelle Yeohs performance in the pilot and was really disappointed that she was killed off so early. PS I said earlier in the review that EVERY character was smug and dislikeable exclude Tilly from that. Ripper and Tilly, please save us all.